Tap water quality for ZIP 98292
15 community water systems linked to this ZIP, largest first.
What this means for you in ZIP 98292
- Is it safe to drink right now?
- Based on the latest EPA data, City of Stanwood Water Dept has no unresolved health-based violations from the past year. Water that meets federal standards is generally considered safe to drink for most healthy people.
- Should I use a filter?
- Optional. Nothing in this data strongly calls for one. Many people still filter for chlorine taste and odor.
- What kind of filter?
- For taste and odor (chlorine/chloramine), an NSF/ANSI 42 pitcher or faucet filter is enough. See matched standards and product picks.
This is general information from public EPA data, not medical advice. Lead often comes from a home’s own pipes, so only a test of your tap can tell your exposure. If you are pregnant, caring for an infant, or have a weakened immune system, ask your doctor or health department.
Shown for the largest system linked to this ZIP. Check your water bill to confirm your provider.
Filters matched to City of Stanwood Water Dept
FILTER PICKS
Look for filters certified (NSF, IAPMO or WQA) to these standards for the specific contaminant. Buttons open the maker’s page or an Amazon search; use “Check NSF listing” to verify a model’s claims. No affiliate links yet — grades are never sold.
Chlorine/chloramine taste
NSF/ANSI 42Aquasana Clean Water Pitcher ~$35
Pitcher for chlorine taste/odor; check the NSF/ANSI 42 listing for the exact model.
Search on Amazon → Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Brita Elite Filter ~$20–40
Common faucet/pitcher option; confirm the 42 claim on the box.
View on Brita → Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Annual water quality report
Utilities must publish a Consumer Confidence Report every year by July 1. Find it on the utility’s website or ask them directly; EPA explains how. · Full report →
Water systems for this ZIP
A
City of Stanwood Water Dept
Serves 17,586 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; PFAS tested (UCMR 5), none above federal limits; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2024).
B
Seven Lakes Water Association
Serves 5,823 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 5 monitoring/reporting violations; PFAS tested (UCMR 5), none above federal limits; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2023).
A
Sno PUD 1 - Warm Beach
Serves 2,977 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2023).
A
Warm Beach Conference Grounds
Serves 1,190 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2025).
A
Port Susan Camp Club #3
Serves 1,000 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 4 monitoring/reporting violations; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2025).
A
Sno PUD 1 - Sunday Lake
Serves 561 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Latest lead 90th percentile on file is from 2020 (older than 5 years, not graded).
A
Tatoosh Water Company
Serves 387 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; 1 not yet resolved; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2022).
A
McKees Beach Assoc
Serves 290 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2024).
A
Lakeside Shores Improvement Assoc.
Serves 166 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2023).
A
Silvana Water Association
Serves 153 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; 1 not yet resolved; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2022).
A
Whiteside Homeowners Association
Serves 90 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2024).
A
Lakewood West Water Assn.
Serves 75 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 2 monitoring/reporting violations; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2025).
A
Kyak Ridge Water System
Serves 66 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2023).
A
Silver Springs Estates Comm Assn
Serves 61 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; 1 monitoring/reporting violation; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2023).
A
Sunny Shores Community Club
Serves 60 people · Groundwater · Full report →
No health-based violations in the last 5 years; No UCMR 5 PFAS results on file; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2024).
COMING SOONGet violation alerts for ZIP 98292
One email when EPA data shows a new violation or test result. No spam.