Water system

Rice University

D
Texas EPA ID TX1010908 8,415 people Surface water · purchased

What this means for you

Is it safe to drink right now?
Based on the latest EPA data, Rice University has no unresolved health-based violations from the past year. Water that meets federal standards is generally considered safe to drink for most healthy people.
Should I use a filter?
It's worth considering. Rice University has a D because of its violation record over the past 5 years (4 health-based), even though nothing is flagged as unresolved in the last year. A filter matched to the contaminants in its violation history is a reasonable precaution.
What kind of filter?
See matched standards and product picks.

This is general information from public EPA data, not medical advice. Lead often comes from a home’s own pipes, so only a test of your tap can tell your exposure. If you are pregnant, caring for an infant, or have a weakened immune system, ask your doctor or health department.

Summary: 4 health-based violations in the last 5 years; 9 monitoring/reporting violations; PFAS tested (UCMR 5), none above federal limits; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2026).
EPA data snapshot 2026Q3. Grade is TapWaterZip's own score — see methods.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”), EPA UCMR 5

ChemicalHighest location averageHighest single sampleFederal limitDetections/samples
PFBS1.7 ppt3.7 pptnone2/8
PFHxA4.2 ppt6.4 pptnone3/8
PFBA11.2 ppt28 pptnone3/8
PFHxS1.6 ppt3.5 ppt10 ppt (proposed repeal)2/8
PFPeA4.4 ppt6.9 pptnone3/8
4 PFAS tested and not detected

PFOA, PFOS, HFPO-DA, PFNA (8 samples each, below EPA minimum reporting levels).

Hazard Index (PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, PFBS): 0.16 (limit 1.0, proposed for repeal).

Averages are per sampling location across UCMR 5 samples (non-detects counted as 0), approximating the rule’s running annual average. Not an official compliance determination; PFOA/PFOS MCL compliance begins April 26, 2029.

Lithium (also tested in UCMR 5, not a PFAS; no federal limit): highest location average 22.3 ppb.

Lead and copper

Lead 90th percentile2.4 ppb2026-06-30
Current action level15 ppbLCRI lowers to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027
Copper 90th percentile1.52 mg/L2025-12-31 · action level 1.3 mg/L

Violations (last 5 years)

BeganTypeContaminant / ruleStatus
2026-04-01Missed or late testingRevised Total Coliform RuleResolved
2026-04-01Required treatment not doneLead and Copper RuleResolved
2026-03-31Required treatment not doneLead and Copper RuleResolved
2026-01-01Missed or late testing/reportingLead and Copper RuleArchived
2025-12-01Missed or late testingRevised Total Coliform RuleResolved
2025-11-01Contaminant above legal limitRevised Total Coliform RuleResolved
2024-10-17Reporting problemLEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolved
2024-10-17Required treatment not doneLEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolved
2023-10-01Missed or late testing/reportingTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Resolved
2023-10-01Missed or late testing/reportingTTHMResolved
2023-06-09Other paperwork/notice violationPublic NoticeResolved
2022-01-01Missed or late testing/reportingTTHMArchived
2022-01-01Missed or late testing/reportingTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Archived

Filters matched to this water

FILTER PICKS

Look for filters certified (NSF, IAPMO or WQA) to these standards for the specific contaminant. Buttons open the maker’s page or an Amazon search; use “Check NSF listing” to verify a model’s claims. No affiliate links yet — grades are never sold.

PFAS (other)

NSF/ANSI 58 (RO, total PFAS claim)NSF/ANSI 53 (check claim)
RO system with total-PFAS claim ~$300–600
Prefer units whose NSF/ANSI 58 listing covers total PFAS or named PFAS.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Certified filter (check contaminant list) varies
Open the NSF listing and confirm the exact chemical before you buy.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Copper

NSF/ANSI 58 (RO)NSF/ANSI 53
Waterdrop G3 / G3P600 RO ~$300–500
Tankless RO; RO broadly reduces nitrate, fluoride, arsenic and many PFAS — confirm the certificate lists yours.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
APEC Essence ROES-50 ~$220–230
Classic under-sink RO; confirm NSF/ANSI 58 certification for your model.
View on APEC →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Aquasana Claryum 3-Stage Under Sink ~$280–350
Under-sink carbon filter; check its listing for lead and PFOA/PFOS claims.
View on Aquasana →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Coliform/E. coli

NSF/ANSI 55 Class A (UV)Boil water notice—follow utility
Class A UV disinfection system ~$100–400
Only after any boil-water notice is lifted; UV does not remove chemicals.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Chlorine/chloramine taste

NSF/ANSI 42
Aquasana Clean Water Pitcher ~$35
Pitcher for chlorine taste/odor; check the NSF/ANSI 42 listing for the exact model.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Brita Elite Filter ~$20–40
Common faucet/pitcher option; confirm the 42 claim on the box.
View on Brita →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Annual water quality report

Utilities must publish a Consumer Confidence Report every year by July 1. Find it on the utility’s website or ask them directly; EPA explains how.

COMING SOONGet violation alerts for Rice University
One email when EPA data shows a new violation or test result. No spam.