Water system
Mount Olive
What this means for you
- Is it safe to drink right now?
- Based on the latest EPA data, Mount Olive has no unresolved health-based violations from the past year. Water that meets federal standards is generally considered safe to drink for most healthy people.
- Should I use a filter?
- It's worth considering. Mount Olive has a D because of its violation record over the past 5 years (3 health-based), even though nothing is flagged as unresolved in the last year. A filter matched to the contaminants in its violation history is a reasonable precaution.
- What kind of filter?
- See matched standards and product picks.
This is general information from public EPA data, not medical advice. Lead often comes from a home’s own pipes, so only a test of your tap can tell your exposure. If you are pregnant, caring for an infant, or have a weakened immune system, ask your doctor or health department.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”), EPA UCMR 5
No PFAS detected in any UCMR 5 sample.
5 PFAS tested and not detected
PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS, HFPO-DA (4 samples each, below EPA minimum reporting levels).
Hazard Index (PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, PFBS): 0 (limit 1.0, proposed for repeal).
Averages are per sampling location across UCMR 5 samples (non-detects counted as 0), approximating the rule’s running annual average. Not an official compliance determination; PFOA/PFOS MCL compliance begins April 26, 2029.
Lead and copper
Violations (last 5 years)
| Began | Type | Contaminant / rule | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-01 | Missed or late testing/reporting | Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved |
| 2025-12-26 | Other paperwork/notice violation | Public Notice | Resolved |
| 2025-12-01 | Required treatment not done | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Resolved |
| 2025-11-01 | Required treatment not done | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Resolved |
| 2025-10-01 | Required treatment not done | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | Resolved |
| 2025-07-12 | Other paperwork/notice violation | Public Notice | Unaddressed |
| 2025-07-01 | Other paperwork/notice violation | Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved |
| 2025-04-01 | Missed or late testing/reporting | Lead and Copper Rule | Unaddressed |
| 2024-07-01 | Missed or late testing/reporting | Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved |
| 2024-01-01 | Missed or late testing/reporting | Chloramine | Resolved |
| 2024-01-01 | Missed or late testing | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Resolved |
| 2023-07-01 | Other paperwork/notice violation | Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved |
| 2023-07-01 | Other paperwork/notice violation | Consumer Confidence Rule | Resolved |
| 2023-07-01 | Missed or late testing/reporting | Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved |
| 2022-11-30 | Missed or late testing/reporting | Lead and Copper Rule | Resolved |
Filters matched to this water
Look for filters certified (NSF, IAPMO or WQA) to these standards for the specific contaminant. Buttons open the maker’s page or an Amazon search; use “Check NSF listing” to verify a model’s claims. No affiliate links yet — grades are never sold.
Lead
NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 58 (RO)Chlorine/chloramine taste
NSF/ANSI 42Annual water quality report
Utilities must publish a Consumer Confidence Report every year by July 1. Find it on the utility’s website or ask them directly; EPA explains how.