Water system

Waterloo Water Works

B
Iowa EPA ID IA0790074 69,504 people Groundwater

What this means for you

Is it safe to drink right now?
Based on the latest EPA data, Waterloo Water Works has no unresolved health-based violations from the past year. Water that meets federal standards is generally considered safe to drink for most healthy people.
Should I use a filter?
Yes, we recommend considering one. Other regulated PFAS (PFHxS) also exceeded 2024 limits.
What kind of filter?
For PFAS, look for NSF/ANSI 53 (with an explicit PFOA/PFOS or total PFAS claim) or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. See matched standards and product picks.

This is general information from public EPA data, not medical advice. Lead often comes from a home’s own pipes, so only a test of your tap can tell your exposure. If you are pregnant, caring for an infant, or have a weakened immune system, ask your doctor or health department.

Summary: No health-based violations in the last 5 years; Other PFAS above 2024 limits (rule proposed for repeal): PFHxS, Hazard Index; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2025).
EPA data snapshot 2026Q3. Grade is TapWaterZip's own score — see methods.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”), EPA UCMR 5

ChemicalHighest location averageHighest single sampleFederal limitDetections/samples
PFPeA4.5 ppt4.8 pptnone2/18
PFHxA1.6 ppt3.1 pptnone1/18
PFBS3.2 ppt3.2 pptnone2/18
PFHxS11.4 ppt13 ppt10 ppt (proposed repeal)4/18
4 PFAS tested and not detected

PFOA, HFPO-DA, PFOS, PFNA (18 samples each, below EPA minimum reporting levels).

Hazard Index (PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, PFBS): 1.14 (limit 1.0, proposed for repeal).

Averages are per sampling location across UCMR 5 samples (non-detects counted as 0), approximating the rule’s running annual average. Not an official compliance determination; PFOA/PFOS MCL compliance begins April 26, 2029.

Lithium (also tested in UCMR 5, not a PFAS; no federal limit): highest location average 19.5 ppb.

Lead and copper

Lead 90th percentile1.8 ppb2025-12-31
Current action level15 ppbLCRI lowers to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027

Violations (last 5 years)

No violations reported since Oct 2021.

Filters matched to this water

FILTER PICKS

Look for filters certified (NSF, IAPMO or WQA) to these standards for the specific contaminant. Buttons open the maker’s page or an Amazon search; use “Check NSF listing” to verify a model’s claims. No affiliate links yet — grades are never sold.

PFAS (other)

NSF/ANSI 58 (RO, total PFAS claim)NSF/ANSI 53 (check claim)
RO system with total-PFAS claim ~$300–600
Prefer units whose NSF/ANSI 58 listing covers total PFAS or named PFAS.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Certified filter (check contaminant list) varies
Open the NSF listing and confirm the exact chemical before you buy.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Chlorine/chloramine taste

NSF/ANSI 42
Aquasana Clean Water Pitcher ~$35
Pitcher for chlorine taste/odor; check the NSF/ANSI 42 listing for the exact model.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Brita Elite Filter ~$20–40
Common faucet/pitcher option; confirm the 42 claim on the box.
View on Brita →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Annual water quality report

Utilities must publish a Consumer Confidence Report every year by July 1. Find it on the utility’s website or ask them directly; EPA explains how.

COMING SOONGet violation alerts for Waterloo Water Works
One email when EPA data shows a new violation or test result. No spam.