Water system

North Mohave Valley

D
Arizona EPA ID AZ0408068 5,190 people Groundwater

What this means for you

Is it safe to drink right now?
EPA records show 1 recent health-based violation for North Mohave Valley that is not marked resolved. Check your utility’s website or bill insert for any boil-water or do-not-drink notice and follow it.
Should I use a filter?
Yes, we recommend considering one. Average PFOS was above the 4 ppt federal limit (compliance deadline April 2029). Unresolved health-based issues make a home filter a reasonable backup.
What kind of filter?
For PFAS, look for NSF/ANSI 53 (with an explicit PFOA/PFOS or total PFAS claim) or NSF/ANSI 58 reverse osmosis. See matched standards and product picks.

This is general information from public EPA data, not medical advice. Lead often comes from a home’s own pipes, so only a test of your tap can tell your exposure. If you are pregnant, caring for an infant, or have a weakened immune system, ask your doctor or health department.

Summary: 2 health-based violations in the last 5 years; 37 monitoring/reporting violations; 4 not yet resolved; PFOA/PFOS average above the 4 ppt federal limit: PFOS; Lead 90th percentile below the action level (2026).
EPA data snapshot 2026Q3. Grade is TapWaterZip's own score — see methods.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”), EPA UCMR 5

ChemicalHighest location averageHighest single sampleFederal limitDetections/samples
PFOS5.2 ppt5.5 ppt4 ppt2/4
PFPeA3.3 ppt3.4 pptnone2/4
PFHxA1.5 ppt3 pptnone1/4
PFBS3.6 ppt3.6 pptnone2/4
PFHxS3.3 ppt3.4 ppt10 ppt (proposed repeal)2/4
3 PFAS tested and not detected

PFOA, PFNA, HFPO-DA (4 samples each, below EPA minimum reporting levels).

Hazard Index (PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, PFBS): 0.33 (limit 1.0, proposed for repeal).

Averages are per sampling location across UCMR 5 samples (non-detects counted as 0), approximating the rule’s running annual average. Not an official compliance determination; PFOA/PFOS MCL compliance begins April 26, 2029.

Lithium (also tested in UCMR 5, not a PFAS; no federal limit): highest location average 97.5 ppb.

Lead and copper

Lead 90th percentile1.3 ppb2026-06-30
Current action level15 ppbLCRI lowers to 10 ppb on Nov 1, 2027

Violations (last 5 years)

BeganTypeContaminant / ruleStatus
2026-06-04Other paperwork/notice violationPublic NoticeUnaddressed
2026-04-01Required treatment not doneLead and Copper RuleUnaddressed
2025-12-21Other paperwork/notice violationPublic NoticeResolved
2025-11-19Other paperwork/notice violationPublic NoticeResolved
2025-10-12Other paperwork/notice violationPublic NoticeResolved
2025-10-02Other paperwork/notice violationConsumer Confidence RuleResolved
2025-10-01Missed or late testing/reportingLead and Copper RuleUnaddressed
2024-12-20Other paperwork/notice violationPublic NoticeUnaddressed
2024-11-01Missed or late testingRevised Total Coliform RuleResolved
2024-10-17Required treatment not doneLEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolved
2024-10-17Reporting problemLEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONSResolved
2024-10-02Other paperwork/notice violationConsumer Confidence RuleResolved
2024-01-01Missed or late testing/reportingTTHMResolved
2024-01-01Missed or late testing/reportingTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Resolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reporting1,1,1-TrichloroethaneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingtrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingXylenes, TotalResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingp-DichlorobenzeneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingEthylbenzeneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reporting1,1,2-TrichloroethaneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingChlorineResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingCHLOROBENZENEResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reporting1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingStyreneResolved
2023-04-01Missed or late testing/reportingo-DichlorobenzeneResolved

Filters matched to this water

FILTER PICKS

Look for filters certified (NSF, IAPMO or WQA) to these standards for the specific contaminant. Buttons open the maker’s page or an Amazon search; use “Check NSF listing” to verify a model’s claims. No affiliate links yet — grades are never sold.

PFOS

NSF/ANSI 53 (PFOA/PFOS claim)NSF/ANSI 58 (RO)
Aquasana Claryum or OptimH2O (PFAS claim) ~$100–350
Aquasana under-sink lineup; must list PFOA/PFOS on the certificate — check before buying.
View on Aquasana →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Clearly Filtered Pitcher (PFAS claim) ~$110
Pitcher option with published PFAS reduction claims; verify NSF/IAPMO listing.
View on Clearly Filtered →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Waterdrop G3 / G3P600 RO ~$300–500
Tankless RO; RO broadly reduces nitrate, fluoride, arsenic and many PFAS — confirm the certificate lists yours.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

PFAS (other)

NSF/ANSI 58 (RO, total PFAS claim)NSF/ANSI 53 (check claim)
RO system with total-PFAS claim ~$300–600
Prefer units whose NSF/ANSI 58 listing covers total PFAS or named PFAS.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Certified filter (check contaminant list) varies
Open the NSF listing and confirm the exact chemical before you buy.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Chlorine/chloramine taste

NSF/ANSI 42
Aquasana Clean Water Pitcher ~$35
Pitcher for chlorine taste/odor; check the NSF/ANSI 42 listing for the exact model.
Search on Amazon →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure
Brita Elite Filter ~$20–40
Common faucet/pitcher option; confirm the 42 claim on the box.
View on Brita →
Check NSF listing · Not an affiliate link · disclosure

Annual water quality report

Utilities must publish a Consumer Confidence Report every year by July 1. Find it on the utility’s website or ask them directly; EPA explains how.

COMING SOONGet violation alerts for North Mohave Valley
One email when EPA data shows a new violation or test result. No spam.